Celeron 4205U vs Pentium 3825U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 3825U
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.87
+2.4%
Celeron 4205U
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.85

Pentium 3825U outperforms Celeron 4205U by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 3825U and Celeron 4205U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25672578
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Power efficiency5.535.40
Architecture codenameBroadwell-U (2015)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release date1 March 2015 (9 years ago)23 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$107

Detailed specifications

Pentium 3825U and Celeron 4205U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rate5 GT/s4 GT/s
Multiplierno data18
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 3825U and Celeron 4205U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1168Intel BGA 1528
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 4205U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Pentium 3825U and Celeron 4205U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 4205U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 4205U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics 610 (300 - 900 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 3825U and Celeron 4205U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 4205U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron 4205U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1212

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 3825U 0.87
+2.4%
Celeron 4205U 0.85

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 3825U 1399
+2.9%
Celeron 4205U 1359

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium 3825U 339
Celeron 4205U 354
+4.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium 3825U 689
+14.8%
Celeron 4205U 600

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Pentium 3825U 190
+39.7%
Celeron 4205U 136

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.87 0.85
Integrated graphics card 0.77 1.85
Recency 1 March 2015 23 January 2019
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

Pentium 3825U has a 2.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron 4205U, on the other hand, has 140.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium 3825U and Celeron 4205U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3825U and Celeron 4205U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 3825U
Pentium 3825U
Intel Celeron 4205U
Celeron 4205U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 73 votes

Rate Pentium 3825U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 130 votes

Rate Celeron 4205U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 3825U or Celeron 4205U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.