Athlon X4 860K vs PRO A12-8870

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A12-8870
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.44
+13%
Athlon X4 860K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.16

PRO A12-8870 outperforms Athlon X4 860K by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A12-8870 and Athlon X4 860K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17551845
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.552.15
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release dateOctober 2016 (8 years ago)12 August 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-8870 and Athlon X4 860K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4 GHz
L1 cacheno data256K
L2 cache2048 KB4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2245 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors3,100 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-8870 and Athlon X4 860K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-8870 and Athlon X4 860K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-8870 and Athlon X4 860K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-8870 and Athlon X4 860K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3-2133
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
Enduron/a-
Switchable graphics+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-8870 and Athlon X4 860K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortn/a-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-8870 and Athlon X4 860K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-8870 and Athlon X4 860K.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A12-8870 2.44
+13%
Athlon X4 860K 2.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A12-8870 3869
+12.7%
Athlon X4 860K 3434

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.44 2.16
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

PRO A12-8870 has a 13% higher aggregate performance score, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The PRO A12-8870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 860K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-8870 and Athlon X4 860K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-8870
PRO A12-8870
AMD Athlon X4 860K
Athlon X4 860K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 216 votes

Rate PRO A12-8870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 252 votes

Rate Athlon X4 860K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A12-8870 or Athlon X4 860K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.