A8-7650K vs PRO A12-8870

Primary details

Comparing PRO A12-8870 and A8-7650K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1754	1929
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.24
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	no data	AMD A-Series (Desktop)
Power efficiency	3.54	1.96
Architecture codename	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date	October 2016 (8 years ago)	7 January 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$152

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-8870 and A8-7650K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	3.7 GHz	3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.2 GHz	3.8 GHz
L1 cache	no data	256 KB
L2 cache	2048 KB	4096 KB
Chip lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Die size	250 mm2	245 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	72 °C
Number of transistors	3,100 million	2,411 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	no data	-
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-8870 and A8-7650K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM4	FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-8870 and A8-7650K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	SSE1-4a, AVX, AES, FMA4, VT
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	+
AVX	+	+
FRTC	+	+
FreeSync	+	+
DualGraphics	-	+
TrueAudio	-	+
PowerNow	-	+
PowerGating	-	+
Out-of-band client management	-	+
VirusProtect	-	+
HSA	-	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-8870 and A8-7650K are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	+
IOMMU 2.0	-	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-8870 and A8-7650K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2400	DDR3-2133
Max memory channels	2	2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core count	8	6
Number of pipelines	no data	384
Enduro	n/a	+
Switchable graphics	+	+
UVD	-	+
VCE	-	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-8870 and A8-7650K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	n/a	+
HDMI	-	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-8870 and A8-7650K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	DirectX® 12
Vulkan	+	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-8870 and A8-7650K.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.48	2.00
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-8870 and A8-7650K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---