Core Ultra 5 134U vs Opteron X2 265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron X2 265 and Core Ultra 5 134U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated892
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Meteor Lake-U
Architecture codenameItaly (2005−2006)Meteor Lake-U
Release dateMay 2005 (19 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron X2 265 and Core Ultra 5 134U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads214
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB12 MB
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data110 °C
Number of transistors233 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Opteron X2 265 and Core Ultra 5 134U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket940no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X2 265 and Core Ultra 5 134U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2 265 and Core Ultra 5 134U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron X2 265 and Core Ultra 5 134U.

PCI Express lanesno data12

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 14
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 9 Watt

Ultra 5 134U has 500% more physical cores and 600% more threads, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 955.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Opteron X2 265 and Core Ultra 5 134U. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Opteron X2 265 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 134U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron X2 265 and Core Ultra 5 134U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron X2 265
Opteron X2 265
Intel Core Ultra 5 134U
Core Ultra 5 134U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X2 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 5 134U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron X2 265 or Core Ultra 5 134U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.