Opteron 6278 vs Opteron 142

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 142
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 85 Watt
0.27
Opteron 6278
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
8.65
+3104%

Opteron 6278 outperforms Opteron 142 by a whopping 3104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 142 and Opteron 6278 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3143882
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency0.307.12
Architecture codenameSledgeHammer (2003−2005)Interlagos (2011−2012)
Release dateSeptember 2003 (21 year ago)1 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron 142 and Opteron 6278 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB768 KB
L2 cache1 MB16 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography130 nm32 nm
Die size193 mm2316 mm2
Number of transistors106 million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 142 and Opteron 6278 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14
Socket940G34
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 142 and Opteron 6278. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 142 and Opteron 6278 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 142 and Opteron 6278. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 142 and Opteron 6278.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 142 0.27
Opteron 6278 8.65
+3104%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 142 428
Opteron 6278 13733
+3109%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 8.65
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 130 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 115 Watt

Opteron 142 has 35.3% lower power consumption.

Opteron 6278, on the other hand, has a 3103.7% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Opteron 6278 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 142 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 142 and Opteron 6278, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 142
Opteron 142
AMD Opteron 6278
Opteron 6278

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Opteron 142 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate Opteron 6278 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 142 or Opteron 6278, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.