Ryzen 5 7500F vs Opteron 6380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6380
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
4.21
Ryzen 5 7500F
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
16.97
+303%

Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms Opteron 6380 by a whopping 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 5 7500F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1386386
Place by popularitynot in top-10014
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.6369.94
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.4624.71
Architecture codenameAbu Dhabi (2012)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date5 November 2012 (12 years ago)22 July 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,150$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 7500F has 11002% better value for money than Opteron 6380.

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 5 7500F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache768 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size315 mm271 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors2,400 million6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 5 7500F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketG34AM5
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 5 7500F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 5 7500F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 5 7500F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 5 7500F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6380 4.21
Ryzen 5 7500F 16.97
+303%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6380 6687
Ryzen 5 7500F 26950
+303%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Opteron 6380 415
Ryzen 5 7500F 2742
+561%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Opteron 6380 3208
Ryzen 5 7500F 12601
+293%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.21 16.97
Recency 5 November 2012 22 July 2023
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 65 Watt

Opteron 6380 has 166.7% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7500F, on the other hand, has a 303.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 540% more advanced lithography process, and 76.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7500F is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 6380 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7500F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 5 7500F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6380
Opteron 6380
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Ryzen 5 7500F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 25 votes

Rate Opteron 6380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 3447 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7500F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6380 or Ryzen 5 7500F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.