FX-8350 vs Opteron 6386 SE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6386 SE
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
5.22
+39.6%
FX-8350
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.74

Opteron 6386 SE outperforms FX-8350 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6386 SE and FX-8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11861477
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.470.84
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD FX-Series (Desktop)
Power efficiency3.532.83
Architecture codenameAbu Dhabi (2012)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date5 November 2012 (12 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,408$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-8350 has 79% better value for money than Opteron 6386 SE.

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6386 SE and FX-8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.8 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache16 MB8192 KB
L3 cache8 MB (per die)no data
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistors2,400 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6386 SE and FX-8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketG34AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6386 SE and FX-8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6386 SE and FX-8350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6386 SE and FX-8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6386 SE and FX-8350.

PCIe version2.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6386 SE 5.22
+39.6%
FX-8350 3.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6386 SE 8291
+39.7%
FX-8350 5936

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.22 3.74
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 125 Watt

Opteron 6386 SE has a 39.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

FX-8350, on the other hand, has 12% lower power consumption.

The Opteron 6386 SE is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 6386 SE is a server/workstation processor while FX-8350 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6386 SE and FX-8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6386 SE
Opteron 6386 SE
AMD FX-8350
FX-8350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 10 votes

Rate Opteron 6386 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3707 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6386 SE or FX-8350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.