Celeron N5105 vs Opteron 6380
Aggregate performance score
Opteron 6380 outperforms Celeron N5105 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 6380 and Celeron N5105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1297 | 1652 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.53 | 0.81 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Abu Dhabi (2012) | Jasper Lake (2021) |
| Release date | 5 November 2012 (11 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,150 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Opteron 6380 has 89% better value for money than Celeron N5105.
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6380 and Celeron N5105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6380 and Celeron N5105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
| Socket | G34 | BGA1338 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6380 and Celeron N5105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6380 and Celeron N5105 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6380 and Celeron N5105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6380 and Celeron N5105.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Opteron 6380 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Opteron 6380 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 65% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron N5105 outperforms Opteron 6380 by 13% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Opteron 6380 outperforms Celeron N5105 by 151% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.32 | 2.62 |
| Recency | 5 November 2012 | 11 January 2021 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 10 Watt |
Opteron 6380 has a 64.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Celeron N5105, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 1050% lower power consumption.
The Opteron 6380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5105 in performance tests.
Be aware that Opteron 6380 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N5105 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6380 and Celeron N5105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
