Celeron N6211 vs Opteron 6380

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6380
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
4.21
+199%
Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.41

Opteron 6380 outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 199% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6380 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13732197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.593.33
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataElkhart Lake
Power efficiency3.4620.53
Architecture codenameAbu Dhabi (2012)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date5 November 2012 (12 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,150$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron N6211 has 464% better value for money than Opteron 6380.

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6380 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache16 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache8 MB (per die)no data
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Number of transistors2,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6380 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4no data
SocketG34BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6380 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6380 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6380 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6380 and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6380 4.21
+199%
Celeron N6211 1.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6380 6687
+198%
Celeron N6211 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.21 1.41
Recency 5 November 2012 17 July 2022
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 6 Watt

Opteron 6380 has a 198.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 1816.7% lower power consumption.

The Opteron 6380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 6380 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6380 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6380
Opteron 6380
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 25 votes

Rate Opteron 6380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6380 or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.