FX-6200 vs Opteron 6376

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6376
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
3.64
+36.3%

Opteron 6376 outperforms FX-6200 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6376 and FX-6200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15181721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.62no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.891.95
Architecture codenameAbu Dhabi (2012)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date5 November 2012 (11 years ago)27 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$750no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6376 and FX-6200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads166
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache768 KB288 KB
L2 cache16 MB6144 KB
L3 cache8 MB (per die)8192 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistors2,400 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6376 and FX-6200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketG34AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6376 and FX-6200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6376 and FX-6200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6376 and FX-6200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6376 and FX-6200.

PCIe version2.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6376 3.64
+36.3%
FX-6200 2.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6376 5572
+36.4%
FX-6200 4085

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Opteron 6376 355
FX-6200 407
+14.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Opteron 6376 3066
+134%
FX-6200 1309

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.64 2.67
Recency 5 November 2012 27 February 2012
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 16 6
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 125 Watt

Opteron 6376 has a 36.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and 8.7% lower power consumption.

The Opteron 6376 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 6376 is a server/workstation processor while FX-6200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6376 and FX-6200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6376
Opteron 6376
AMD FX-6200
FX-6200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 6 votes

Rate Opteron 6376 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 133 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6376 or FX-6200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.