Xeon w9-3575X vs N200

Primary details

Comparing N200 and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1613	30
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	33.96
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Power efficiency	50.47	14.48
Architecture codename	no data	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date	1 January 2023 (1 year ago)	24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

N200 and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	no data	44
Threads	4	88
Base clock speed	no data	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.7 GHz	4.8 GHz
L1 cache	no data	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	no data	2 MB (per core)
L3 cache	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache	97.5 MB
Chip lithography	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Die size	no data	4x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	79 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on N200 and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1264	FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N200 and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	-	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	+
TSX	-	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
GPIO	+	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	no data	+
Deep Learning Boost	-	+

Security technologies

N200 and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	no data	+
SGX	no data	-
OS Guard	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N200 and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by N200 and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800	DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size	16 GB	4 TB
Max memory channels	1	8
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel UHD Graphics	N/A
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Graphics max frequency	750 MHz	no data
Execution Units	32	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of N200 and Xeon w9-3575X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

3

no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by N200 and Xeon w9-3575X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	+	no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	4096 x 2160@60Hz	no data
Max resolution over DisplayPort	4096 x 2160@60Hz	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by N200 and Xeon w9-3575X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	12.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N200 and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe version	no data	5.0
PCI Express lanes	9	112
USB revision	2.0/3.2	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	3.20	52.02
Recency	1 January 2023	24 August 2024
Threads	4	88
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	340 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between N200 and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---