Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs N200

VS

Primary details

Comparing N200 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1618not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency50.13no data
Architecture codenameno dataStrix Halo (2025)
Release date1 January 2023 (2 years ago)6 January 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

N200 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data4 nm
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on N200 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP11
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N200 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N200 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon 8060S

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N200 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2023 6 January 2025
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 55 Watt

N200 has 816.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between N200 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between N200 and Ryzen AI Max+ 395, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel N200
N200
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 39 votes

Rate N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI Max 395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about N200 or Ryzen AI Max+ 395, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.