Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 vs N200
Primary details
Comparing N200 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1618 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 50.13 | no data |
Architecture codename | no data | Strix Halo (2025) |
Release date | 1 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
N200 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | no data | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 24 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 5 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 64 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | no data | 4 nm |
64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on N200 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | FP11 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N200 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N200 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon 8050S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N200 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2023 | 6 January 2025 |
Threads | 4 | 24 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 55 Watt |
N200 has 816.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between N200 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between N200 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.