Ryzen 7 7840U vs Mobile Sempron SI-40
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 7 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 382 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Architecture codename | Sable (2008−2009) | Phoenix-U (Zen 4) |
| Release date | 4 July 2008 (15 years ago) | May 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Current price | $7.54 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 7 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus support | 1800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 7 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1g2 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 7 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125V | no data |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 7 7840U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 7 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-5600 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 7 7840U.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms Mobile Sempron SI-40 by 1517% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 28 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 7 7840U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 7 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
