Phenom X4 9850B vs Pentium 4 560
Aggregate performance score
Phenom X4 9850B outperforms Pentium 4 560 by a whopping 486% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 560 and Phenom X4 9850B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3204 | 2315 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Pentium 4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.23 | 1.23 |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | August 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 560 and Phenom X4 9850B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 285 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 450 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 560 and Phenom X4 9850B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 95 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 560 and Phenom X4 9850B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 95 Watt |
Pentium 4 560 has 8% lower power consumption.
Phenom X4 9850B, on the other hand, has a 485.7% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
The Phenom X4 9850B is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 560 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 560 and Phenom X4 9850B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
