Solo T1200 vs Mobile Sempron M100
Aggregate performance score
Mobile Sempron M100 outperforms Core Solo T1200 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Sempron M100 and Core Solo T1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3188 | 3287 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | Core Solo |
| Power efficiency | 0.83 | 0.56 |
| Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) | January 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron M100 and Core Solo T1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 90 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 151 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron M100 and Core Solo T1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S | 479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 27 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron M100 and Core Solo T1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | AMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron M100 and Core Solo T1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.22 | 0.16 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 27 Watt |
Mobile Sempron M100 has a 37.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 8% lower power consumption.
The Mobile Sempron M100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron M100 and Core Solo T1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
