Solo T1200 vs Mobile Sempron M100

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron M100 and Core Solo T1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Mobile SempronCore Solo
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron M100 and Core Solo T1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHz667 MHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data90 mm2
Number of transistorsno data151 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron M100 and Core Solo T1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS479
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron M100 and Core Solo T1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsAMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMXno data
VirusProtect+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron M100 and Core Solo T1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Mobile Sempron M100 82.5
+40.6%
Solo T1200 116

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 27 Watt

Mobile Sempron M100 has a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron M100 and Core Solo T1200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron M100 and Core Solo T1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron M100
Mobile Sempron M100
Intel Core Solo T1200
Core Solo T1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron M100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate Core Solo T1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron M100 or Core Solo T1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.