Opteron X2 280 vs Mobile Athlon 64 4000+

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Opteron X2 280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Architecture codenameNewark (2003)Italy (2005−2006)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)September 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Opteron X2 280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Number of transistorsno data233 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Opteron X2 280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno data940
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt95 Watt

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 95 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ has 53.2% lower power consumption.

Opteron X2 280, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Opteron X2 280. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ is a notebook processor while Opteron X2 280 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Opteron X2 280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 4000+
Mobile Athlon 64 4000+
AMD Opteron X2 280
Opteron X2 280

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X2 280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ or Opteron X2 280, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.