Mobile Athlon 64 4000+: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.20

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ provides poor benchmark performance at 0.20% of a leader's which is a 96-core EPYC 9655P.

Summary

This is a Newark architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 1 core and 1 thread, and is based on 90 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2600 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is a processor with a TDP of 62 Watt.

Primary details

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the ranking3240
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentLaptop
SeriesMobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency0.31of 100.00 (Ryzen Z1 Extreme)
Architecture codenameNewark (2003)
Release dateno data

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)
Threads1
Boost clock speed2.6 GHzof 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS)
Bus rate800 MHz
Chip lithography90 nmof 3 nm (Apple M3 Max 16-Core)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)62 Wattof 500 Watt (Xeon 6960P)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Mobile Athlon 64 4000+. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ 0.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ 313

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+'s performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook CPUs.


C-70 100
Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ 100

Intel equivalent

According to our data, the closest Intel alternative to Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ is Atom N2600, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 7 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest Intel rivals to Mobile Athlon 64 4000+:

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ 100

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Mobile Athlon 64 4000+, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 7 configurations using Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ in our database.

All comparisons with Mobile Athlon 64 4000+

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 4000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.