Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ vs Atom 330

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomMobile Athlon 64
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Newark (2003)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/s800 MHz
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache112 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors94 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPBGA437no data
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 330 363
+16%
Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ 313

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 62 Watt

Atom 330 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 675% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom 330 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 4000+
Mobile Athlon 64 4000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 64 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or Mobile Athlon 64 4000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.