Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ vs Atom E3825

Place in the ranking	3180	3241
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Atom	Mobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency	3.79	0.31
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-I (2013)	Newark (2003)
Release date	8 October 2013 (11 years ago)	no data
Launch price (MSRP)	$73	no data

Detailed specifications

Atom E3825 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Boost clock speed	1.33 GHz	2.6 GHz
Bus rate	no data	800 MHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	no data
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	no data
L3 cache	0 KB	no data
Chip lithography	22 nm	90 nm
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Atom E3825 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	Intel BGA1170	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3825 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3825 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Intel HD Graphics

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom E3825 0.24
+20%

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ 0.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom E3825 378
+20.8%

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ 313

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.24	0.20
Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	22 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	62 Watt

Atom E3825 has a 20% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 933.3% lower power consumption.

The Atom E3825 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E3825 and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.