Ultra 5 225F vs Mobile Athlon 64 4000+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core Ultra 5 225F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Architecture codenameNewark (2003)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core Ultra 5 225F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads110
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data21 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core Ultra 5 225F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data1851
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core Ultra 5 225F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core Ultra 5 225F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core Ultra 5 225F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core Ultra 5 225F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core Ultra 5 225F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 10
Chip lithography 90 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 65 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ has 4.8% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 225F, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core Ultra 5 225F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 225F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Core Ultra 5 225F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 4000+
Mobile Athlon 64 4000+
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
Core Ultra 5 225F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 5 225F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ or Core Ultra 5 225F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.