Processor 300 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1309
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Power efficiencyno data9.28
Architecture codenameOakville (2003−2004)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release dateAugust 2004 (20 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$82

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128K80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno dataIntel 7 nm
Die size193 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors106 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor 300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor 300.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ 440
Processor 300 7160
+1527%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 46 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ has 31.4% lower power consumption.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor 300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is a notebook processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.