VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3134not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile Athlon 64C7-M
Power efficiency0.76no data
Architecture codenameOakville (2003−2004)Esther
Release dateAugust 2004 (20 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz400 MHz
L1 cache128Kno data
L2 cache512Kno data
Chip lithographyno data90 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors106 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt3.5 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 3 Watt

VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 has 1066.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and VIA C7-M C7-M-1000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
VIA C7-M C7-M-1000
C7-M C7-M-1000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate VIA C7-M C7-M-1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ or VIA C7-M C7-M-1000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.