Duron 950 vs Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Duron 950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesMobile Athlon 64AMD Duron
Architecture codenameOakville (2003−2004)K7 (2000−2004)
Release dateAugust 2004 (20 years ago)12 July 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Duron 950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz0.95 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate800 MHz200 MT/s
Multiplierno data9.5
L1 cache128Kno data
L2 cache512K64 KB
Chip lithographyno data180 nm
Die size193 mm2105.68 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors106 million25 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Duron 950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket754no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt44.4 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Duron 950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 44 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ has 25.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Duron 950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is a notebook processor while Duron 950 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ and Duron 950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
AMD Duron 950
Duron 950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Duron 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ or Duron 950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.