Pentium III 800 vs Athlon Neo MV-40

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and Pentium III 800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlon Neono data
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)Coppermine T (2000)
Release date6 January 2009 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Pentium III 800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads1no data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz0.8 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB8 KB
L2 cache512 KB256 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm180 nm
Die sizeno data80 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistorsno data44 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Pentium III 800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketASB1370
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt38 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Pentium III 800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Pentium III 800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 38 Watt

Athlon Neo MV-40 has a 176.9% more advanced lithography process, and 153.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Pentium III 800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon Neo MV-40 is a notebook processor while Pentium III 800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Pentium III 800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
Intel Pentium III  800
Pentium III 800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 63 votes

Rate Pentium III 800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo MV-40 or Pentium III 800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.