Celeron M ULV 722 vs Mobile A A110

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile A A110 and Celeron M ULV 722 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Mobile Ano data
Architecture codenameStealey (2007)no data
Release date4 June 2007 (17 years ago)1 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile A A110 and Celeron M ULV 722 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads1no data
Base clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.8 GHzno data
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.775V - 1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Mobile A A110 and Celeron M ULV 722 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket663-ball micro-FCBGABGA956
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile A A110 and Celeron M ULV 722. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Mobile A A110 and Celeron M ULV 722 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile A A110 and Celeron M ULV 722 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2007 1 July 2008
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 5 Watt

Mobile A A110 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron M ULV 722, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobile A A110 and Celeron M ULV 722. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile A A110 and Celeron M ULV 722, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Mobile A A110
Mobile A A110
Intel Celeron M ULV 722
Celeron M ULV 722

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobile A A110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M ULV 722 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile A A110 or Celeron M ULV 722, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.