Pentium 4 HT EE 3.40 vs Athlon 64 2000+

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 2000+ and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.40 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameLima (2008−2009)Gallatin (2003−2004)
Release dateJune 2008 (16 years ago)February 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 2000+ and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB8 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die size77 mm2237 mm2
Number of transistors122 million178 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 2000+ and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2775
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt110 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 2000+ and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.40. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 110 Watt

Athlon 64 2000+ has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1275% lower power consumption.

Pentium 4 HT EE 3.40, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 2000+ and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.40. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 2000+ and Pentium 4 HT EE 3.40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 2000+
Athlon 64 2000+
Intel Pentium 4 HT EE 3.40
Pentium 4 HT EE 3.40

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 13 votes

Rate Athlon 64 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT EE 3.40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 2000+ or Pentium 4 HT EE 3.40, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.