Athlon XP 1700+ vs Mobile A A110
Primary details
Comparing Mobile A A110 and Athlon XP 1700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 3358 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Mobile A | no data |
Power efficiency | no data | 0.16 |
Architecture codename | Stealey (2007) | Thoroughbred (2001−2002) |
Release date | 4 June 2007 (17 years ago) | October 2001 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile A A110 and Athlon XP 1700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 1.47 GHz |
Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 256 KB |
L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 180 nm |
Die size | no data | 150 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 37 million |
64 bit support | - | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile A A110 and Athlon XP 1700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | 663-ball micro-FCBGA | A |
Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 64 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 180 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 64 Watt |
Mobile A A110 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 2033.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Mobile A A110 and Athlon XP 1700+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Mobile A A110 is a notebook processor while Athlon XP 1700+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile A A110 and Athlon XP 1700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.