i5-1038G7 vs Microsoft SQ1
Primary details
Comparing Microsoft SQ1 and Core i5-1038G7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1484 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Qualcomm Snapdragon | Intel Ice Lake |
| Power efficiency | 0.12 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) | Ice Lake U (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 2 October 2019 (5 years ago) | 4 May 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Microsoft SQ1 and Core i5-1038G7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Microsoft SQ1 and Core i5-1038G7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3000 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Core i5-1038G7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Qualcomm Adreno 685 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 October 2019 | 4 May 2020 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3000 Watt | 28 Watt |
Microsoft SQ1 has 100% more physical cores, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
i5-1038G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 10614.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Microsoft SQ1 and Core i5-1038G7. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Microsoft SQ1 and Core i5-1038G7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
