EPYC 7373X vs GX-210JA

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing GX-210JA and EPYC 7373X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMDno data
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)Milan-X (2022)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

GX-210JA and EPYC 7373X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data3.05 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on GX-210JA and EPYC 7373X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFT3 BGASP3
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-210JA and EPYC 7373X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by GX-210JA and EPYC 7373X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-210JA and EPYC 7373X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by GX-210JA and EPYC 7373X.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 22 March 2022
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 240 Watt

GX-210JA has 3900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7373X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GX-210JA and EPYC 7373X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GX-210JA is a notebook processor while EPYC 7373X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between GX-210JA and EPYC 7373X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA
AMD EPYC 7373X
EPYC 7373X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7373X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about GX-210JA or EPYC 7373X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.