GX-210JA vs EPYC 7351P

VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking410not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.45no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD
Power efficiency8.99no data
Architecture codenameNaples (2017−2018)Temash (2013)
Release date20 June 2017 (7 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$750no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads322
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache1.5 MB128 KB
L2 cache8 MB1 MB
L3 cache64 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors19200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FT3 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)155 W, 170 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth170.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7351P 25657
+10246%
GX-210JA 248

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2017 23 May 2013
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 32 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 6 Watt

EPYC 7351P has an age advantage of 4 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GX-210JA, on the other hand, has 2483.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 7351P is a server/workstation processor while GX-210JA is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7351P and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7351P
EPYC 7351P
AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 14 votes

Rate EPYC 7351P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7351P or GX-210JA, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.