Iris Graphics 48 vs FX-9800P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-9800P and Iris Graphics 48 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2009not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Iris Graphics
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Gen9
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

FX-9800P and Iris Graphics 48 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz0.3 GHz
L2 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-9800P and Iris Graphics 48 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9800P and Iris Graphics 48. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data
Maximum memory sizeno data65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Iris Graphics 48 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-9800P and Iris Graphics 48. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9800P and Iris Graphics 48, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P
Intel Iris Graphics 48
Iris Graphics 48

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 43 votes

Rate FX-9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 3 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9800P or Iris Graphics 48, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.