Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs FX-8370

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8370
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.88
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
29.39
+657%

Xeon Platinum 8368Q outperforms FX-8370 by a whopping 657% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8370 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1446147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.82no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.9410.30
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8370 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)38
Threads876
Base clock speed4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

FX-8370 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

PCIe versionn/a4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8370 3.88
Xeon Platinum 8368Q 29.39
+657%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8370 6166
Xeon Platinum 8368Q 46681
+657%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.88 29.39
Recency 2 September 2014 6 April 2021
Physical cores 8 38
Threads 8 76
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 270 Watt

FX-8370 has 116% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q, on the other hand, has a 657.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 375% more physical cores and 850% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8370 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8370 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8368Q is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370 and Xeon Platinum 8368Q, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8370
FX-8370
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 377 votes

Rate FX-8370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8370 or Xeon Platinum 8368Q, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.