FX-8370 vs Core i7-6700TE
Aggregate performance score
FX-8370 outperforms i7-6700TE by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i7-6700TE and FX-8370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1363 | 1351 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.14 | 1.00 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i7 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| Release date | 19 October 2015 (8 years ago) | 2 September 2014 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $303 | no data |
| Current price | $1384 (4.6x MSRP) | $200 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
FX-8370 has 614% better value for money than i7-6700TE.
Detailed specifications
Core i7-6700TE and FX-8370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 8192 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 122 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i7-6700TE and FX-8370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | 1151 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6700TE and FX-8370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
| SIPP | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i7-6700TE and FX-8370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6700TE and FX-8370 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6700TE and FX-8370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 530 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6700TE and FX-8370.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | n/a |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
FX-8370 outperforms Core i7-6700TE by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
FX-8370 outperforms Core i7-6700TE by 1% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-6700TE outperforms FX-8370 by 86% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i7-6700TE outperforms FX-8370 by 47% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.97 | 4.01 |
| Recency | 19 October 2015 | 2 September 2014 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-6700TE and FX-8370.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6700TE and FX-8370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
