Ryzen 5 1300 vs FX-8370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1438not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.88no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.94no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads8no data
Base clock speed4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million4800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 1300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 1300.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

FX-8370 has 100% more physical cores.

Ryzen 5 1300, on the other hand, has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 1300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370 and Ryzen 5 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8370
FX-8370
AMD Ryzen 5 1300
Ryzen 5 1300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 375 votes

Rate FX-8370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 13 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8370 or Ryzen 5 1300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.