Microsoft SQ1 vs FX-8370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

FX-8370
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.96
+6.2%
Microsoft SQ1
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 3000 Watt
3.73

FX-8370 outperforms Microsoft SQ1 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8370 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14441484
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.83no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataQualcomm Snapdragon
Power efficiency2.940.12
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)2 October 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8370 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3 GHz
L2 cache8192 KBno data
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt3000 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370 and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Qualcomm Adreno 685

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370 and Microsoft SQ1.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8370 3.96
+6.2%
Microsoft SQ1 3.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8370 6166
+5.9%
Microsoft SQ1 5822

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.96 3.73
Recency 2 September 2014 2 October 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 3000 Watt

FX-8370 has a 6.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 2300% lower power consumption.

Microsoft SQ1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FX-8370 and Microsoft SQ1.

Note that FX-8370 is a desktop processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8370
FX-8370
Microsoft SQ1
SQ1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 375 votes

Rate FX-8370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 56 votes

Rate Microsoft SQ1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8370 or Microsoft SQ1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.