Core 2 Extreme QX9770 vs FX-8370

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8370
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.88
+33.8%
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 136 Watt
2.90

FX-8370 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9770 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8370 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14571666
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.95no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.942.02
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)March 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8370 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rateno data1600 MHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB12 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm22x 107 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data55 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million820 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt136 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

FX-8370 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8370 3.88
+33.8%
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 2.90

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8370 6166
+33.7%
Core 2 Extreme QX9770 4611

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.88 2.90
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 136 Watt

FX-8370 has a 33.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 8.8% lower power consumption.

The FX-8370 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370 and Core 2 Extreme QX9770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8370
FX-8370
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Core 2 Extreme QX9770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 381 vote

Rate FX-8370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 241 vote

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8370 or Core 2 Extreme QX9770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.