Xeon Platinum 8351N vs FX-8320E

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8351N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1609not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.74no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.11no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$147no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8351N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)36
Threads872
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data54 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8351N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8351N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8351N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8351N are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8351N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8351N.

PCIe versionn/a4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8320E 439
Xeon Platinum 8351N 1617
+268%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8320E 1689
Xeon Platinum 8351N 15233
+802%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 September 2014 6 April 2021
Physical cores 8 36
Threads 8 72
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 225 Watt

FX-8320E has 136.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8351N, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 350% more physical cores and 800% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8351N. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8320E is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8351N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320E and Xeon Platinum 8351N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E
Intel Xeon Platinum 8351N
Xeon Platinum 8351N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1102 votes

Rate FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8351N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320E or Xeon Platinum 8351N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.