Xeon Platinum 8351N vs FX-8320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 8351N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1520not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 8351N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)36
Threads872
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data54 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 8351N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 8351N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Statusno dataLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 8351N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 8351N are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 8351N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 8351N.

PCIe versionn/a4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8320 460
Xeon Platinum 8351N 1617
+252%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8320 1809
Xeon Platinum 8351N 15233
+742%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 6 April 2021
Physical cores 8 36
Threads 8 72
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 225 Watt

FX-8320 has 80% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8351N, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 350% more physical cores and 800% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 8351N. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8320 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8351N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 8351N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320
FX-8320
Intel Xeon Platinum 8351N
Xeon Platinum 8351N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1338 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8351N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320 or Xeon Platinum 8351N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.