Celeron D 326 vs FX-8320E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320E and Celeron D 326 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1615not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.79no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.11no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)September 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$147no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8320E and Celeron D 326 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.53 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.53 GHz
L1 cacheno data16 KB
L2 cache8192 KB256 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size315 mm2109 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C68 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million125 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data1.25V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and Celeron D 326 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+PLGA478,PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt84 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and Celeron D 326. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

FX-8320E and Celeron D 326 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and Celeron D 326 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and Celeron D 326. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and Celeron D 326.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 84 Watt

FX-8320E has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron D 326, on the other hand, has 13.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-8320E and Celeron D 326. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320E and Celeron D 326, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E
Intel Celeron D 326
Celeron D 326

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1108 votes

Rate FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 82 votes

Rate Celeron D 326 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320E or Celeron D 326, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.