Duron 1300 vs FX-4300
Primary details
Comparing FX-4300 and Duron 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1971 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.26 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Duron |
| Power efficiency | 1.86 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 30 January 2002 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $122 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
FX-4300 and Duron 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 200 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 13 |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 64 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 105.68 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 25 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.225 V - Max: 1.3875 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-4300 and Duron 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM3+ | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 60 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4300 and Duron 1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4300 and Duron 1300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4300 and Duron 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4300 and Duron 1300.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 30 January 2002 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 60 Watt |
FX-4300 has an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.
Duron 1300, on the other hand, has 58.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-4300 and Duron 1300. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4300 and Duron 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
