Duron 1600 vs Athlon XP 2000+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon XP 2000+ and Duron 1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3355not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Duron
Power efficiency0.16no data
Architecture codenameThorton (2001−2003)K7 (2000−2004)
Release dateJanuary 2002 (22 years ago)15 August 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$25no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP 2000+ and Duron 1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data266.66 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache256 KB64 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography180 nm130 nm
Die size150 mm280.89 mm2
Number of transistors63 million37 Million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP 2000+ and Duron 1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAno data
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt57 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP 2000+ and Duron 1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 180 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 57 Watt

Duron 1600 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 22.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon XP 2000+ and Duron 1600. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 2000+ and Duron 1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP 2000+
Athlon XP 2000+
AMD Duron 1600
Duron 1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 43 votes

Rate Athlon XP 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 12 votes

Rate Duron 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon XP 2000+ or Duron 1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.