Atom S1260 vs FX-4170
Primary details
Comparing FX-4170 and Atom S1260 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1958 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.45 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Centerton (2012) |
| Release date | 27 February 2012 (12 years ago) | 11 December 2012 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $64 |
Detailed specifications
FX-4170 and Atom S1260 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.1875 V - Max: 1.4125 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-4170 and Atom S1260 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | FCBGA1283 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 8.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4170 and Atom S1260. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4170 and Atom S1260 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4170 and Atom S1260. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 10.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4170 and Atom S1260.
| PCIe version | n/a | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
| PCI support | no data | PCI Support |
| UART | no data | UART |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 February 2012 | 11 December 2012 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 8 Watt |
FX-4170 has 100% more physical cores.
Atom S1260, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 1462.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-4170 and Atom S1260. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-4170 is a desktop processor while Atom S1260 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4170 and Atom S1260, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
