Atom S1260 vs FX-4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-4100 and Atom S1260 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2029not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Centerton (2012)
Release date12 October 2011 (12 years ago)11 December 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$64

Detailed specifications

FX-4100 and Atom S1260 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache192 KB56 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4100 and Atom S1260 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCBGA1283
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and Atom S1260. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and Atom S1260 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and Atom S1260. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data10.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and Atom S1260.

PCIe versionn/a2.0
PCI Express lanesno data8
PCI supportno dataPCI Support
UARTno dataUART

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4100 2610
+396%
Atom S1260 526

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2011 11 December 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 8 Watt

FX-4100 has 100% more physical cores.

Atom S1260, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1087.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-4100 and Atom S1260. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-4100 is a desktop processor while Atom S1260 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4100 and Atom S1260, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4100
FX-4100
Intel Atom S1260
Atom S1260

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 846 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Atom S1260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4100 or Atom S1260, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.