EPYC 74F3 vs EPYC 9754

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.24
+65.6%
EPYC 74F3
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
38.19

EPYC 9754 outperforms EPYC 74F3 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and EPYC 74F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1277
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0911.20
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency16.6215.06
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900$2,900

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 74F3 has 928% better value for money than EPYC 9754.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and EPYC 74F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12824 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads25648
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache64 KB (per core)1536 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)12 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm7 nm+
Die size8x 73 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors71,000 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and EPYC 74F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketSP5SP3
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 74F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 74F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 74F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 74F3.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.24
+65.6%
EPYC 74F3 38.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+65.6%
EPYC 74F3 60666

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

EPYC 9754 1603
+11.5%
EPYC 74F3 1438

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

EPYC 9754 15552
+22.6%
EPYC 74F3 12689

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.24 38.19
Recency 13 June 2023 12 January 2021
Physical cores 128 24
Threads 256 48
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 240 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 65.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

EPYC 74F3, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 74F3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and EPYC 74F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
AMD EPYC 74F3
EPYC 74F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or EPYC 74F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.