EPYC 7713P vs EPYC 9754

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9754
2023
128 cores / 256 threads, 360 Watt
63.24
+23.7%
EPYC 7713P
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
51.12

EPYC 9754 outperforms EPYC 7713P by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7713P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.097.13
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency16.5421.39
Architecture codenameBergamo (2023)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,900$5,010

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7713P has 554% better value for money than EPYC 9754.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7713P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12864 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads256128
Base clock speed2.25 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.68 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache64 KB (per core)4 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)32 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm7 nm+
Die size8x 73 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors71,000 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7713P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5SP3
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7713P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7713P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7713P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7713P.

PCIe version5.04.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9754 63.24
+23.7%
EPYC 7713P 51.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9754 100460
+23.7%
EPYC 7713P 81201

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.24 51.12
Recency 13 June 2023 12 January 2021
Physical cores 128 64
Threads 256 128
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 225 Watt

EPYC 9754 has a 23.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

EPYC 7713P, on the other hand, has 60% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9754 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7713P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9754 and EPYC 7713P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9754
EPYC 9754
AMD EPYC 7713P
EPYC 7713P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate EPYC 9754 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate EPYC 7713P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9754 or EPYC 7713P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.