Apple M3 Max 16-Core vs EPYC 9654P

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9654P
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
71.74
+178%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
25.82

EPYC 9654P outperforms Apple M3 Max 16-Core by a whopping 178% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9654P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7189
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.90no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCApple M3
Power efficiency18.8631.33
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)no data
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)30 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,625no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9654P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores9616 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads19216
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.06 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache384 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm3 nm
Die size12x 72 mm2no data
Number of transistors78,840 million92000 Million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9654P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5no data
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt78 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9654P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9654P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9654P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800no data
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9654P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9654P 71.74
+178%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core 25.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9654P 113949
+178%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core 41013

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 71.74 25.82
Recency 10 November 2022 30 October 2023
Physical cores 96 16
Threads 192 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 78 Watt

EPYC 9654P has a 177.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 361.5% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M3 Max 16-Core in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9654P is a server/workstation processor while Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9654P and Apple M3 Max 16-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 270 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9654P or Apple M3 Max 16-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.