Ryzen 9 7900 vs EPYC 9534

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 9534
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
61.35
+92.2%

EPYC 9534 outperforms Ryzen 9 7900 by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9534 and Ryzen 9 7900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17132
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.7062.86
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency19.9844.78
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)14 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,803$429

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 7900 has 2228% better value for money than EPYC 9534.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9534 and Ryzen 9 7900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads12824
Base clock speed2.45 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.45 GHz5.4 GHz
Multiplier24.5no data
L1 cache4 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache64 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nm5 nm
Die size8x 72 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors52,560 million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9534 and Ryzen 9 7900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5AM5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9534 and Ryzen 9 7900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9534 and Ryzen 9 7900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9534 and Ryzen 9 7900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size6 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9534 and Ryzen 9 7900.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes12824

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9534 61.35
+92.2%
Ryzen 9 7900 31.92

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 9534 93884
+92.2%
Ryzen 9 7900 48845

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 61.35 31.92
Recency 10 November 2022 14 January 2023
Physical cores 64 12
Threads 128 24
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 9534 has a 92.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.

Ryzen 9 7900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 330.8% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 9534 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 7900 in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 9534 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9534 and Ryzen 9 7900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9534
EPYC 9534
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
Ryzen 9 7900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9534 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 340 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9534 or Ryzen 9 7900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.