Sempron 2300+ vs Apple M2
Primary details
Comparing Apple M2 and Sempron 2300+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 806 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 44.48 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Barton (2001−2004) |
| Release date | 10 June 2022 (2 years ago) | January 2001 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $45 |
Detailed specifications
Apple M2 and Sempron 2300+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.48 GHz | 1.58 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 20 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | no data | 101 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 20000 Million | 63 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M2 and Sempron 2300+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 62 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 62 Watt |
Apple M2 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 2500% more advanced lithography process, and 210% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M2 and Sempron 2300+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while Sempron 2300+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 and Sempron 2300+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
