Ultra 7 265H vs EPYC 9174F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking112not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.17no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Power efficiency10.32no data
Architecture codenameGenoa (2022−2023)no data
Release date10 November 2022 (2 years ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,850no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data8
Low Power Efficient-coresno data2
Threads3216
Base clock speed4.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz5.3 GHz
Multiplier41no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography5 nm, 6 nmno data
Die size8x 72 mm2no data
Number of transistors52,560 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size6 TiB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth460.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Arc™ 140T GPU
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.3 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265H.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes12828
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 November 2022 1 January 2025
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 115 Watt

EPYC 9174F has 100% more threads.

Ultra 7 265H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 178.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265H. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 9174F is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 9174F and Core Ultra 7 265H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
Core Ultra 7 265H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 9174F or Core Ultra 7 265H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.